Sunday, May 3, 2009
One former homeowner rigged his front door with coffeepots filled with boiling water. Another left piles of ferret feces. Hidden compartments have been used as living spaces, with people hiding in attics, tool sheds and garages to elude police.
In the D.C. suburbs, a new class of squatter has emerged, as people illegally remain in homes after they have lost them to the bank. Some have become aggressive in their efforts to stay, setting booby traps to ward off police.
"People got in over their heads, and they don't want to leave," said Loudoun County sheriff's Capt. Chuck Wyant, who oversees the department's five-person eviction unit.
The problem seems especially acute outside the Capital Beltway. Initially viewed as an unusual symptom of the economic downturn, squatting has grown into something closer to an epidemic in Loudoun. Court-ordered evictions in the county have more than doubled over the past three years, and a six-month backlog of cases at the Loudoun courthouse is a dire reminder that things might only get worse, Wyant said. A docket at the courthouse has been created for the approximately 2,300 in the county facing evictions.
"It's hit us hard, worse than other counties, because we grew so quickly," he said.
Squatters in Sterling
The squatters represent two distinct groups: victims of the foreclosure crisis, who have lost homes to the banks and refuse to leave, and homeless people who see in the growing number of vacant houses an opportunity to upgrade their standard of living.
Steve Whetzel has increasingly been dealing with the first group. He runs KNK Home Preservation in Warrenton, a company banks hire to clear out newly foreclosed homes. It was never unusual to find rotting food, broken appliances and less-than-sightly bathrooms left behind by disgruntled residents.
But in recent weeks, Whetzel said, he's responded to cases in which homeowners have threatened to harm themselves or others. About six weeks ago, at a house north of Frederick, a man threatened to kill members of Whetzel's crew, and county SWAT team members were called in. In a case outside Baltimore, a father tried to commit suicide by overdosing on pills as he was being evicted. His two children were still inside the house.
"It's definitely intensified," Whetzel said. "Most people know we're coming."
A national survey released last month showing the impact of widespread foreclosures found that an estimated 42 percent of those who have lost their homes in the housing crisis now have no fixed address. People being forced out of foreclosed homes represent a quarter of those facing evictions in Loudoun; the others are renters who have stopped paying their landlords. The number of writ of possession procedures, a civil eviction process that can take months, more than doubled since 2005, from 639 to 1,310 last year.
Related Stories
Related Coverage
Advertisement
"All of a sudden, a lot of longtime renters, a lot of families, are being evicted, with little or no notice," said Vickie Koth, executive director of the Good Shepherd Alliance, an Ashburn-based homelessness nonprofit group. "It's overwhelming."
Wyant said calls about squatters aren't just coming from the low- and middle-income neighborhoods of Sterling and Sterling Park anymore. Take the two-story house on West Maple Avenue in middle-class Sterling. It looks simple enough from the outside, but there are signs of trouble.
The front and back yards are unkempt. A rear glass door, which overlooks the city's public golf course, is broken. Beer bottles and old clothing litter the wooden deck. They are indications, neighbors said, that the $430,000, four-bedroom house has turned into a haven for squatters.
"It was sort of weird," said a next-door neighbor, Nicholas J. White. "One day, after it was foreclosed upon, I just saw a lot of people coming and going. You could tell something was up."
Jose Huvy Hernandez, 32, of Ashburn and Bertha Olinda Bonilla, 37, of Sterling, two longtime Loudoun residents — one of whom is believed to be a relative of the home's former owner — were arrested there three weeks ago for allegedly living and partying at the house.
Squatters have become an unlikely but increasingly common nuisance in Loudoun, which is among the wealthiest regions of Northern Virginia.
Loudoun sheriff's deputies have been sent to several multimillion-dollar houses in affluent western Loudoun in recent weeks.
Those trend lines are mirrored in every other Northern Virginia county and across the nation, as once-wealthy communities report a surge in the number of cases of people illegally living in cordoned-off and condemned homes.
In Prince William County, the number of court-ordered evictions has shot up 40 percent since 2006. In nearby Arlington County, the number has increased by 33.5 percent since last year. In Fairfax County, it's up by 13 percent over the past year.
"It's put a lot of extra work on our desks, and it's not an easy job," said Arlington sheriff's Maj. Mike Pinson.
Squatting has long been a barometer of economic health in urban areas. During down times in the District and New York in the 1970s and 1980s, squatting was a way of life for many low-income city dwellers. In some areas hit hard by the spike in foreclosures, including Cleveland, Detroit and Miami, some agencies for the homeless have even resorted to finding abandoned and foreclosed homes to break into.
The majority of those facing eviction in the Washington region are low- and middle-income renters, county social services agencies say. A number of the cases involve families who have lost their homes and struggled to transition into rental units that they also cannot afford.
"People are getting desperate," said Cheryl Tillman, who manages rental assistance programs at the nonprofit Northern Virginia Family Service in Oakton. "Renters have a harder time because their situations, oftentimes, are just so precarious."
Wyant, the Loudoun sheriff's captain, said the desperation has given rise to determined squatters who refuse to leave their homes.
"It's difficult for some of our guys to handle," Wyant said. "But I always tell them, 'You're taking something back from someone that was illegally taken.' "
Tagged: crime, foreclosure, homelessness, Loudoun Sheriff's Office, police, Sterling, Sterling Park
Maid To Please is offering LoudounExtra.com readers $25 off their first house cleaning, or $10 their third house cleaning.
• View all deals from Maid To Please | All deals
• $25 Off House Cleaning From Maid To Please! posted: 4/28/09
|
Search Deals and Business Directory |
Are you happy that the school year is over?
Comments:
Note: LoudounExtra.com does not necessarily agree with comments posted below — responsibility lies with the relevant reader alone. Peruse our reader agreement and privacy policy
Exactly the type of behavior you would expect from sub-prime borrowers. Why don't we have debtors prisons anymore?
Posted by dingus5 (anonymous) on May 3, 2009 at 8:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Disgusting behavior. These bigots always expect to get something for nothing because they feel superior. When they're denied free services or housing they set traps to hurt or kill the innocent. They are hateful hardcore bigots.
Posted by hunter340 (anonymous) on May 3, 2009 at 10:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Coming soon to your neighborhood - -
Another 'law' patterned on England.
Like obummer and his Dimocrat cronies who busily scrawl out the USA version of England's "national lack of healthcare" (relying on nature to eliminate the elderly and the ill), they will soon busily scrawl out the USA version of England's "home protection" bill.
This new bill will disallow law enforcement from evicting from any property any person(s) who are currently inhabiting it, regardless of whether these persons are the original owners or are squatters. England is in a mess with this and will shortly be joined by O'BummerNation.
Posted by segeny (anonymous) on May 3, 2009 at 1:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It's amazing how quickly people jump on this as being a political issue or generalizing the specific examples to a large group of "sub-prime" borrowers. Since Obama has been in office for 3 months, this is now all his fault. Is there no shame on the part of predator lenders who helped put people in this position by making them loans they knew were unaffordable? A friend of mine is a mortgage broker, but refused to write a loan for a rate that didn't match long term income. He consistently lost business to others without a conscience, because the banks didn't care. Now the banks are crying that the government should bail them out because they didn't know what they were doing? Who're the ones getting the billion $ checks? Certainly not anyone living in Loudoun.
How about making a constructive comment about how banks can work better with those having difficulty making their payments? Or make a suggestion as to where these families can live after loosing their home and their jobs. Job loss is not restricted to the poor. With the low savings rate and consumerism encouraged by our government, none of us are more than a few months away from being in the same position.
Posted by danwpnews (anonymous) on May 3, 2009 at 9:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Dan,
So are you defending the practices of these poeple who trash their houses before forclosing on a contract that they entered into willingly?
Posted by dingus5 (anonymous) on May 3, 2009 at 10:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
No, dan, it is not all obummer's fault. However, he will be exacerbating the issue with his socialist/fascist agenda.
And let us not forget that his cronies (particularly PurpleBarneyFrank and Where'sMyCutDodd) actively worked against Bush's attempt to curtail the excesses of Fannie and Freddie.
How can anyone NOT politicize the disaster caused by politicians???? The same politicians who rammed through the Community Reinvestment Act in July of 2008 and who then used that Act to threaten and coerce banks into unsound lending.
This is no defense of the banks, but they are not the ones solely at fault here.
Posted by segeny (anonymous) on May 4, 2009 at 6:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)
dingus- Not that it makes much of a difference but prime foreclosures have been outpacing sub-prime foreclosures since July of 2008. (Try googling foreclosures prime vs subprime as a start) Recent evictions from foreclosure are just as likely to be these prime lenders, not just the sub-prime lenders you reference. That guy rigging the coffee pots may well be doing that as he walks away from his 4500 sqft McMansion and into his Escalade...
Posted by mitch (anonymous) on May 4, 2009 at 7:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Mitch, thanks for the sanity in your answer. Can't believe the likes of segeny. Since he is throwing that tired under-effective "socialist/fascist" label around I must assume that he is just another mouthpiece for the GOP (guarantors of plutocracy" agenda. Too bad all of those folks don't do their research before opening their bigot mouths. Thankfully, segeny is part of a dimenishing minority.
Posted by quietobserver (anonymous) on May 4, 2009 at 9:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Well doesn't it make sense that the subprimes would default first? The primes had more in reserve to stave off foreclosure but their time has now come.
Posted by dingus5 (anonymous) on May 4, 2009 at 4:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Victims of the foreclosure crisis" is how the article describes these people. Victims? Sure, some of them may have lost their job and now can't pay the bills. Yet, I am sure quite a large number of them bought homes on risky mortgages with little or no money down and could never realistically afford the place. They should have lived in reality and done some homework on the paperwork they were signing and what the real estate agent, home builder and mortgage broker were feeding them.
Either way, none of them are "victims" of a "crisis". The "crisis" was brought on by irresponsible practices by both lender and borrower. The real victims are the people who didn't buy in to the interest-only loans, ARMs, 100% financing, piggy back mortgages, and thinking that the value of their home would continue to rise at 10% a year, who now help bail these banks out with their tax dollars.
Posted by BurtReynolds (anonymous) on May 5, 2009 at 10:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)
If you have a mortgage you are not a homeowner. You are essentially renting your home from the bank.
Posted by gieriscm1 (anonymous) on May 5, 2009 at 11:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
quietobserver (anonymous)- good thing you're anonymous. You'd be embarrassing yo momma with your inane comments and sub-par spelling.
Posted by segeny (anonymous) on May 5, 2009 at 4:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Nobody is really a homeowner then. You still have to pay taxes on that property forever.
Posted by mazman128 (anonymous) on May 8, 2009 at 10:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Segeny, it would be easier to take your comments seriously if you didn't call people names in your messages (like Obummer). If the situation really is as you say then your point would be better stated with just the facts and no name calling.
Posted by yaddayadda (anonymous) on May 8, 2009 at 10:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Dont have an account? Sign up!
Post a comment