Monday, November 24, 2008
RICHMOND — Virginia, known for some of the nation's toughest policies on illegal immigration, appears to be abandoning its hard-line approach as state officials consider proposals to help foreign-born residents assimilate, including increasing the number of English classes.
In the coming weeks, the Virginia Commission on Immigration will send Gov. Timothy M. Kaine (D) two dozen recommendations, most of which would help immigrants instead of penalizing them.
Those on both sides of the issue say interest in immigration has waned because of the growing economic crisis, a clearer understanding of the state's limitations on a largely federal issue and backlash at the voting booth.
"I think some reality set in," said state Sen. John C. Watkins (R-Chesterfield), the group's chairman.
Recommendations include shortening the Medicaid residency requirements for certain qualified immigrants, offering in-state tuition to immigrants who meet specific criteria and creating an immigration assistance office.
The commission considered but did not adopt proposals to force immigrants to carry special identification cards, allow hospitals to fingerprint patients who do not pay their bills and require proof of legal residence to be eligible for public assistance.
Related Stories
Related Coverage
Advertisement
Virginia officials have spent years addressing the issue of immigration, taking whatever actions they could within the confines of state and federal law. More recently, immigration turned out to be a less-popular election issue than some lawmakers had hoped. As a result, state officials appear to be shifting their focus from fighting illegal immigration to assimilating the ever-growing population of legal immigrants.
Del. C. Todd Gilbert (R-Shenandoah), who served on the commission and is staunchly anti-illegal immigration, described the panel's approach to enforcement as "very much watered-down."
"I can't totally disagree that some people are leery of the issue, because maybe it wasn't the wedge issue that some thought it would be," Gilbert said.
In recent years, as Congress repeatedly failed to pass immigration legislation, many states considered immigration bills that addressed employment, identification, law enforcement and public benefits.
In Virginia, Republicans and some Democrats in conservative-leaning districts seized on the issue, unveiling proposals to curb illegal immigration and talking up the cause on the campaign trail. Much of the debate was in Northern Virginia, including Prince William County, where officials curtailed government services to illegal immigrants and increased enforcement.
In 2007, a Washington Post poll found that 9 percent of likely voters in Virginia, and 17 percent in Northern Virginia, considered immigration the most important issue facing the state. But this year only 1 percent of likely voters surveyed listed immigration as a top issue.
During the General Assembly's session this year, the number of immigration bills introduced was the highest in recent years, but most measures died. State and local governments found that they could do little to resolve the issue.
"This is really a federal issue," Watkins said. "They have . . . pushed it down toward the states, and the time has come for them to deal with it. We have no jurisdiction."
Claire Guthrie Gastanaga, who represents several immigrant groups, attributed the diminishing interest to the realization that Virginia is ahead of other states in dealing with illegal immigration. "I think that Virginia has long been at the forefront in acting in this area," she said. "Much of the work was done before the commission ever met."
Virginia was the first state to tighten security on driver's licenses in response to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. The state acted after it was discovered that several of the Sept. 11 hijackers had Virginia identification. In 2003, the General Assembly passed legislation requiring applicants to provide proof of citizenship or legal presence in the United States, along with proof of Virginia residency.
Gastanaga said the state now needs to focus on creating a welcoming environment and helping immigrants acclimate to the state.
The Immigration Commission spent more than a year writing recommendations for Kaine after public hearings that included expert testimony and comment from legislators and the Virginia Crime Commission. The proposals would have to be adopted by Kaine, the General Assembly or Congress.
The commission proposed increasing the number of English classes and creating a plan to address the needs of foreign-born residents. It also urged the federal government to compile more complete immigration statistics, increase the number of visas for foreign workers and pass comprehensive immigration legislation.
Of the 12 million illegal immigrants estimated to be in the United States, 250,000 to 300,000 live in Virginia, according to the Pew Hispanic Center in Washington. The U.S. Census Bureau says an additional 440,000 people in Virginia are not U.S. citizens but are in the state legally.
The commission was made up of legislators, local government and law enforcement officials, doctors, lawyers and representatives of various immigrant communities. Members were appointed by Kaine and the General Assembly.
Gilbert and another commission member, Del. Robert G. Marshall (R-Prince William), both advocates of a hard-line approach to illegal immigration, said it was obvious from the start that they would represent the minority view on the panel.
"It was pretty clear the fix was in from the beginning," Gilbert said.
But the Rev. Gerry Creedon, pastor of St. Charles Borromeo Catholic Church in Arlington County and a commission member, said that the group was objective and that he was pleased with its "positive direction."
Creedon said commission members recognized that in the past some immigration proposals were raised for "political purposes" and could not be enforced. "They wanted credit for taking a tough position, but you knew they wouldn't be implemented," he said.
Polling director Jon Cohen contributed to this report.
Tagged: immigration, State news
Maid To Please is offering LoudounExtra.com readers $25 off their first house cleaning, or $10 their third house cleaning.
• View all deals from Maid To Please | All deals
• $25 Off House Cleaning From Maid To Please! posted: 4/28/09
|
Search Deals and Business Directory |
Are you happy that the school year is over?
Comments:
Note: LoudounExtra.com does not necessarily agree with comments posted below — responsibility lies with the relevant reader alone. Peruse our reader agreement and privacy policy
Sounds like an OB tactic. Big talk then suddenly a step back........for the love of this county would someone please grow a set and make tough calls.
Posted by Funnyguyva (anonymous) on November 24, 2008 at 10:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
No state or federal or state aid of any kind should be given to anyone who is in this country illegally. Instead, we need to help our newest citizens who followed the rules, waited in line, learned our official language (which is English), took the oath of citizenship and have agreed to assimilate into the unique American culture rather than remain in a separate culture. Business should be required to verify the citizenship of all the workers they hire and be fined if they knowingly hire illegals.
Posted by obviously (anonymous) on November 24, 2008 at 10:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm curious to know what obviously means by "the unique American culture." Can you describe it?
Posted by daviddanaan (anonymous) on November 24, 2008 at 12:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Sure, speak English, value hard work and education. Obey laws and take advantage of opportunities that America provides its citizens. Has it gotten to the point where we dont know what our own culture is?
Posted by stingo (anonymous) on November 24, 2008 at 3:43 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Migrating to America legally is, and should be, a long, drawn-out procedure meant to protect the interests of American citizens. It involves more than simply jumping a fence and heading north in pursuit of free health care, education, food stamps, and other handouts paid for by U.S. taxpayers.
Legal immigration means enduring rigorous hurdles like background checks to detect a criminal background or possible ties to terrorists; medical examinations to detect diseases still prevalent in third-world nations, but long since eradicated here; proof of financial solvency so as to prevent newcomers from becoming a burden on U.S. taxpayers, and testing for knowledge of American history and English skills.
Those who have jumped a fence into America in order to avoid our immigration checks are not immigrants. Rather, they are invading criminals, with no claim whatsoever to the welcome mat extended to legal immigrants.
Such people do not deserve recognition or sanction by the United States, and should be rounded up and deported as soon as possible, without exception.
Posted by hunter340 (anonymous) on November 25, 2008 at 5:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hunter340 speaks for me.
Posted by dingus3 (anonymous) on November 25, 2008 at 8:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
daviddanaan: Respecting the rule of law is a good start.
Posted by dingus3 (anonymous) on November 25, 2008 at 8:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
After all- the United States was founded by people who followed the "law" to the letter.
.
Acoja con satisfacción a mis hermanos de americanos. No tome por favor a esta gente grosera seriamente. Ella no tiene ninguna clase
.
We're back to the mass deportation idea, fondly supported by a person calling themselves a dingus?
.
Watching this crowd cast themselves further into the wilderness of political obscurity is enjoyable in a sick watch a train wreck sort of way.
.
No olvide votar a hermanos
Posted by AFF3 (anonymous) on November 25, 2008 at 1:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
AFF3: I ran your comments through the Swedish-English translator in Babelfish and it came back total gibberish. Seems you're not so smart.
Posted by dingus3 (anonymous) on November 25, 2008 at 2:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
There is no need to round up anyone or forcibly deport anyone. Once our elected officials find the spine to enforce our existing immigration laws, you'll see a lot of self-deportation. With increased enforcement of the existing immigration laws you'll see the under the table jobs dry up. Seasonal jobs will be filled by people who actually value the notion of being a "guest worker" in this country by following our laws and respecting our language and culture. They may even end up with better pay since wage rates will be determined by the (legal) free market.
Posted by obviously (anonymous) on November 25, 2008 at 9:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)
'obviously', I somewhat agree with you; however, I don't know that it would work in practice. I think people are more likely to stay and commit crime or work under-the-table and become a further nuisance to society than deciding one day that it's not worth it.
Posted by Hoqenishy (anonymous) on November 26, 2008 at 8:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
A Federal responsiblity to determine - it's all about reelection! Note - All kids should have health care - I don't care if they are legal or illegal. I'm tired with our elected officals! It's all about them and their self-importance - I do believe many of our politicians actually believe their positions require taking care of the American people they represent. It only takes a year before they realize that they like the power - how great it is! Get on with it - are illegals entitled to what? What are our responsibilities? I've met many illegals and my heart breaks when I hear the stories. But I can tell you, my family all came in legally. We're not used to having 15-20 people living in a small townhouse, apartment, etc. with trucks parked all over the place to include the gangs that are forming in some better neighborhoods. Elected Officials - Make a decison and not based on whether you'll be in office during next reelection! I'm sick of it! Federal reps won't make a decision - check each and find out how long they have been in office. OMG - elected officials who were supposed to be part time!
Posted by connie.lotfi (anonymous) on November 26, 2008 at 2:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Dont have an account? Sign up!
Post a comment