Panel Calls Off Road Tax Collection

Panel Calls Off Road Tax Collection 

Va. High Court Ruled Legislation Unconstitutional

Advertisement


All Advertisers

The Northern Virginia Transportation Authority ordered the state and local governments Monday night to stop collecting taxes and fees that the Virginia Supreme Court ruled are unconstitutional.

The authority, which had been administering the taxes and fees since Jan. 1 on such things as auto repairs and car rentals, issued the order after a day of confusion over whether local governments should stop collecting them.

The Loudoun County Board of Supervisors had opposed the taxes and fees. Eight Northern Virginia residents, anti-tax activists and Loudoun supervisors had fought the plan in court.



Photo Gallery

Photo: 0/1

« Previous | Next »
Ruling Hurts Projects

Larger Version

These planned projects could advance if additional transportation funding becomes available. (GRAPHIC: Gene Thorp)

Ruling Hurts Projects

Larger Version

This man walked up the path that is behind him in the photo, looked for an opening between traffic and ran across this portion of the Route 15 bypass near the corner of Edwards Ferry Road. The state Supreme Court's ruling hurt plans to widen the bypass from four to six lanes just south and east of this area on the stretch from Route 15 east to Route 7. (Tracy A. Woodward)

View all thumbnails

On Friday, the court said that regional taxing authorities created by the General Assembly last year violated the state constitution because voters do not elect the panel members. But until Monday afternoon, some local governments were still collecting the fees because they had not received official word about the court’s decision.

“The Northern Virginia Transportation Authority is developing a refund plan for the special taxes and fees that have been paid to date,” the panel said in a statement ordering the cessation of fees. “This is very complex, involving state and local authorities as well as various business entities.”

The authority said “potential applicants for refund should retain evidence of payment as it may be required as proof of payment.”

The authority’s order came too late for an Arlington resident.

“The Supreme Court ruling said what they are doing is illegal — ‘Don’t take my money,’ ” said Stephen Schwartz, 29, who paid a $1,600 grantors tax Monday on the sale of his South Arlington house. “I am a young guy. This is real money we are talking about.”

Earlier Monday, Gov. Timothy M. Kaine (D) said he wanted to salvage the regional taxing authorities to pay for new roads and secure several hundred million dollars in statewide revenue for highway maintenance.

Lawmakers have until Saturday’s planned adjournment to attempt to find a solution, or they will return this spring for a special session.

A year ago, lawmakers believed they had tackled Virginia’s transportation problems by devising a plan to raise $1.1 billion a year for road and transit projects, the largest such infusion in 21 years. But now, in addition to dropping abusive-driver fees and coping with a court decision nullifying the legislation, the Virginia Department of Transportation is telling local governments they will lose millions of dollars for highway construction next year because of the slowdown in the economy.

The budget cuts, including a 47 percent reduction for primary and secondary road construction, are on top of the $300 million a year for Northern Virginia projects that are threatened by the Supreme Court decision.

“If commuters think things are bad now, they are only going to get worse,” said Kala Quintana, spokeswoman for the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority.

Kaine administration officials and legislative leaders plan to meet this week to try to come up with a solution. House Republicans and Kaine and Senate Democrats appear to be offering different answers, meaning the chances of reaching a deal before Saturday appear grim.

House Republicans are floating a proposal to require local governments to vote on which taxes and fees to impose — an idea opposed by local governments last year.

Kaine and Senate Majority Leader Richard L. Saslaw (D-Fairfax) said Monday that they want legislators to impose the taxes. Democrats accuse Republicans of wanting to push the state’s responsibilities onto local officials.

How would you raise money for Northern Virginia's congested roads?

See the results without voting »

“We are going to do it from here [Richmond], or it ain’t going to happen,” Saslaw said. “It’s a nonstarter. Any taxes that get imposed are going to be voted on by the General Assembly of Virginia. Period.”

House Majority Whip M. Kirkland Cox (R-Colonial Heights) responded that House Republicans probably won’t agree to raise taxes this year.

“To say anything is a nonstarter is a mistake. We have tried not to draw lines in the sand,” Cox said. “We need to fix the regional plans, but I don’t think there is much appetite from us to impose a new tax increase.”

But Kaine said, “We’ve got to take our responsibility seriously. The court said, ‘General Assembly, if you want to do this, you have to do it yourself.’ ”

INTERNET ENHANCED

Breaking Down the Fees

Here is a breakdown of the seven taxes and fees that have been collected in Northern Virginia since Jan. 1 to help pay for the Transportation Funding Reform Act. The fees were collected by Fairfax, Arlington, Loudoun and Prince William counties and the cities of Fairfax, Falls Church, Alexandria, Manassas and Manassas Park.

  • Congestion relief fee: an additional 40 cents for every $100 on property sales.
  • Motor vehicle rental tax: 2 percent of rental rate.
  • Hotel room tax: 2 percent of room rate.
  • Safety inspection fee: $10 a year.
  • Sales tax on auto repairs: 5 percent of labor charges.
  • Regional vehicle registration fee: $10 a year.
  • Initial vehicle registration fee: 1 percent of value (a one-time fee).

The General Assembly will decide whether and how to give refunds to people who have already paid the taxes and fees.

House Majority Leader H. Morgan Griffith (R-Salem) said Kaine’s remarks “make negotiations almost impossible” because the governor signaled to him Sunday that the GOP approach might work. “I feel like I have been punched in the gut,” Griffith said.

Kaine also plans to use the Supreme Court decision to push for more money statewide to address a projected $400 million shortfall in the part of the state budget used to repair and maintain roads. Kaine doesn’t have a specific proposal, but he noted that he pushed for an increase in the sales tax on cars during the first two years of his term.

The loss of statewide revenue, including a decline in sales and fuel tax revenue and the proposed elimination of the abusive-driving fees, is already having an effect.

Until recently, the state was expecting to spend $447 million next year on local and regional highway projects.

But Secretary of Transportation Pierce Homer sent a letter to local leaders Friday saying that they would now be getting $238 million. Transit funding will be reduced by 10 percent, which Homer said could result in a $15 million cut in public transportation projects in Northern Virginia next year.

But the Supreme Court ruling is what caused the most confusion.

Kaine said he wants the General Assembly to come up with a plan for offering refunds to the people who have already paid the taxes and fees.

Staff writer Anita Kumar contributed to this report.

Tagged: growth, traffic, transportation

Comments:

Note: LoudounExtra.com does not necessarily agree with comments posted below — responsibility lies with the relevant reader alone. Peruse our reader agreement and privacy policy

Looks like an illegal trying to cross in the middle of the road. Just another reason we need to get rid of them for good.

Posted by rahaha (anonymous) on March 5, 2008 at 10:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)

The state's Supreme Court isn't concerned with funding road and transportation projects. But, we should be. I've read self-congratulatory comments now from Mick Stanton and the developers. However, none has a real plan for funding transportation issues.

It might have been real justice if the eight Loudoun residents, anti-tax advocates, and supervisors that pursued this ruling should now be responsible for coming up with a plan to fund transportation.

I don't like taxes, but the funding possibilities are limited:

- tax ourselves
- tax the whole state for our local issues
- get the Federal Government to pay for it
- get developer proffers

The latter two are not working. The Feds aren't funding the metro, so are unlikely to fund an even more local transportation project.

Developer proffers are how we got into this mess in the first place. They don't fund what's necessary. After all, a developer has to have their profit - if they funded all the needs of a development the profit would go away.

That leaves taxes. Why should the rest of the state pay for our poor planning? Do we care about the tunnel issues near Norfolk? Or the highway needs in Roanoke?

We're going to have to pay for our previous Board of Supervisor's mistakes. And that'll be through local taxes. I don't like it either, but I don't see options.

Posted by malcolm (anonymous) on March 6, 2008 at 8:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Post a comment

Username:
Password:
(Forgotten your password?)


Comment:

Deal of the Day

$25 Off House Cleaning From Maid To Please!

Maid To Please is offering LoudounExtra.com readers $25 off their first house cleaning, or $10 their third house cleaning.

View all deals from Maid To Please | All deals

Latest Deal

• $25 Off House Cleaning From Maid To Please! posted: 4/28/09

Search Deals and Business Directory

Your Thoughts...

Are you happy that the school year is over?

View results

Most...

Viewed
Commented
E-mailed

  1
Region II Cheerleading Competition (Photo gallery)
Posted at 3:41 p.m., November 4, 2007
  2
Cheerleaders Compete at District Finals (Story)
Posted at 9:34 a.m., October 24, 2007
  3
Appalachian Trail Animals (Photo gallery)
Posted at 5:54 p.m., November 12, 2007
  4
Stone Bridge High School (Football team)
  5
Broad Run High School (Football team)