COLUMN: Why Was Father Who Killed Son in Car Acquitted?



Advertisement


All Advertisers

The tragic and horrifying case of Miles Harrison, the Loudoun County man who killed his 21-month-old son by leaving him in a broiling hot SUV for nine hours last July, ended Wednesday when a Fairfax County judge acquitted the father of involuntary manslaughter.

As much as the father has suffered, and as much as he proved in court that he truly did love and adore that boy, Judge Terrence Ney's decision unjustly fails to hold Harrison accountable for his negligence. Just because someone who does wrong feels terribly about his misdeed does not absolve the justice system of its responsibility to hold all of us to a standard of decent behavior.

The facts in the case are clear and awful. Chase Harrison was saved from a Russian orphanage by Miles and Carol Harrison of Purcellville, who made three difficult trips overseas to gain custody of the developmentally-delayed baby.

The Post's Tom Jackman describes what happened on the fateful day:

Harrison testified that on July 8, he dressed Chase in a T-shirt and shorts, put sunscreen on him and strapped him in the rear car seat of his GMC Yukon. Harrison said he stopped at a dry cleaner in Purcellville, leaving Chase in the vehicle, then drove to Herndon. He had made or received 13 calls on his cellphone and drove past the exit for Chase's day care, focused on a large work project and problems with employees.

Harrison arrived at his office about 7:30 a.m. and went in, leaving Chase in the back seat on a 90-degree day. Co-workers spotted Chase at 5 p.m.; he died of heat stroke.

The legal question posed by the case focuses on whether the boy's death was merely an accident, or met the legal test of "negligence so gross, wanton and culpable as to show a callous disregard for human life."

Harrison's lawyer argued that the father demonstrated negligence, but nothing gross or wanton. This was an accident, an oversight, a mistake.

But the state prosecutor said the facts in this case cannot be sloughed off to mere accident. "The fact that he disregarded his duties," said Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney Katherine Stott, "when these circumstances are likely to cause injury of death, shows callous disregard."

It's hard for me to see how anyone, parent or not, could conclude that leaving a child unattended for a full day in a steamy hot car--essentially forgetting about the existence of the life that you have been entrusted with protecting and cherishing--could be chalked up to accident.

INTERNET ENHANCED

Related Stories

Parents make mistakes, even big fat stupid ones. One evening when my daughter was one, I drove to a toy store on Connecticut Avenue with her in the back seat. We had a rental car that day and when my wife and I got out, I shut the driver's door and immediately realized that I had left the keys--and my daughter--inside the locked vehicle. I left my wife to watch our daughter and I ran for help from the gas station across the street, but a team of mechanics, helpful D.C. police and I were unable to jimmy the lock open. Finally, after about 10 minutes, with my daughter now quite upset, one of the cops smashed open one of the car windows and Julia was safe. Her life was never in danger, but I felt that I had failed her totally and unacceptably. There is of course no direct analogy to the Harrison case, because despite my idiotic act, there was never a moment when the child was in danger. But I learned that very bad things could happen to kids even when parents are trying to be responsible.

Had Miles Harrison merely made the boneheaded move of going into the cleaners while his little boy sat in the hot car, he too would have been in the position of having made a mistake. But instead he left his responsibility as a parent entirely behind.

He literally forgot what he had promised to do when he entered the role of father. If that's not callous disregard, what is?

I'm not saying that Harrison is dangerous or that the rest of us need to be protected from him. And he clearly has suffered greatly, spending time in a psychiatric hospital after the death and testifying in a way that bared his love and his pain.

But that's all after the fact. And the fact is that some people are cut out to be parents and some people are capable of forgetting that their little child, their defenseless charge whom they must protect like no one else in the world will, even exists. A finding of guilt would have helped reestablish that distinction, not for the Harrisons, but for all of us.

Tagged: crime, Herndon, Purcellville

Comments:

Note: LoudounExtra.com does not necessarily agree with comments posted below — responsibility lies with the relevant reader alone. Peruse our reader agreement and privacy policy

Please let me point out that I am not a lawyer and everything I am saying is pure conjecture. Perhaps the reason Mr. Harrison was acquitted had to do with the charge of involuntary manslaughter filed against him? Was there a minimum sentence tied to a conviction? Were there lesser charges that could have been filed instead where the judge could have suspended sentence? My assumption here is that the judge may have been forced to decide between a guilty verdict with mandatory jail time or not guilty and so he chose not guilty. If he had the option to find Mr. Harrison guilty and provide a suspended sentence and community service etc..., perhaps a guilty verdict would have been the result. If I am wrong and a mandatory sentence was not required then perhaps a guilty verdict or guilty of a lesser charge with no jail time would have been more appropriate. I, like so many others, feel that this family should not be forced to suffer any more than they are already suffering. My heart and prayers go out to them.

Posted by salm624 (anonymous) on December 19, 2008 at 11:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Even though I've never understood how this man could have left his child in the car all day, I do understand this - he's going to carry the weight and consequences of his actions until his dying breath. Moreover, in this day and age of electronic research & investigation, Google and all the other search engines, background checks and security screenings, Miles Harrison will be forever linked - electronically - to what happened. "Are you THAT Miles Harrison", he will be forever asked. There is no place on earth where he will ever be free from the consequences of his actions,not even at his death. Surely his obit will even recall the details of that fateful July day. While I agree with you Marc, Mr. Harrison will be carrying a sentence -of sorts- every day for the rest of his life. It's tragic all the way around.

Posted by 2k9s1 (anonymous) on December 19, 2008 at 1:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Mr. Harrison will never be allowed to adopt another child. That's both good and bad.
<br/>
It's good because he'll be forever guilty in the eyes of anyone working for an adoption agency who bothers to perform a decent background check on him, should he attempt another adoption in the future.
<br/>
It's bad because the wife will also be barred from future adoptions and it means that some child who would otherwise be adopted might remain in an orphanage longer than might otherwise be the case.
<br/>
Seems to me that no matter what the 'official' verdict was, this man is 'symbolically' guilty and will pay a price in ways none of the rest of us can begin to imagine.

Posted by obviously (anonymous) on December 19, 2008 at 5:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Mr. Fisher,
I have noticed that the story of this father's acquittal received less comments in the first few days after it was published than the article about the driveway painting. I have not analyzed the content of all the comments, but it seems to me that people were more angry at the HOA in the first article than our judicial system in the situation you are writing about. Just an observation....

Posted by momof2 (anonymous) on December 19, 2008 at 7:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)

salm624- you are correct; sometimes the verdict just doesn't seem fair. It's up to the prosecutor to ensure that the charges are appropriate and the case is winnable. ( I'm not a lawyer, either. I did sleep at a Holiday Inn , however)

Posted by mlod2 (anonymous) on December 20, 2008 at 2:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Mr. Harrison is facing a life sentence - The loss of a child and he will have to live with this for the rest of his life. Unlike the Anthony Case in Florida, the question is not only intent, but does the punishment fit the alleged crime?

I believe that if the car seat was in the front seat, instead of the passenger area, this would not have occured. Being a parent who follows the rules, he placed his child in the back and had a human moment, which regrettably, cost the life of his child.

Maybe designers and inventors should take note and design an alarm system that will prevent this from happening in the future?

Posted by Computer_Forensics_Expert_Computer_Expert_Witness (anonymous) on January 6, 2009 at 5:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Post a comment

Username:
Password:
(Forgotten your password?)


Comment:

Deal of the Day

$25 Off House Cleaning From Maid To Please!

Maid To Please is offering LoudounExtra.com readers $25 off their first house cleaning, or $10 their third house cleaning.

View all deals from Maid To Please | All deals

Latest Deal

• $25 Off House Cleaning From Maid To Please! posted: 4/28/09

Search Deals and Business Directory

Your Thoughts...

Are you happy that the school year is over?

View results

Most...

Viewed
Commented
E-mailed

  1
Broad Run High School (Football team)
  2
Stone Bridge High School (Football team)
  3
Up Close: Frans Kok (Story)
Posted at 12:00 a.m., December 9, 2008
  4
America's Cup of Polo Media Event (Photo gallery)
Posted at 12:00 a.m., May 3, 2008
  5
Cheerleaders Compete at District Finals (Story)
Posted at 9:34 a.m., October 24, 2007