Court Hears Toll Road Transfer Challenge

Article Tools

Share This +

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

The same court that two months ago struck down Virginia’s regional transportation financing plans is considering a similar case challenging the state’s planned transfer of the Dulles Toll Road to the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority.

The Virginia Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in a lawsuit filed by two Northern Virginia residents against state transportation officials and agencies.

The lawsuit alleges that the transfer would violate the state constitution, because it wasn’t approved by the General Assembly.

INTERNET ENHANCED

Related Stories

April 11, 2008 -- Agency Nearly Done Issuing Refunds
March 26, 2008 -- Transportation Projects Hit Roadblock

Richmond Circuit Court Judge Margaret P. Spencer dismissed the lawsuit in March 2007, ruling that the state has sovereign immunity against such claims. Plaintiffs Patrick Gray and Gray Nagle appealed, and a decision is likely in June.

In February, the state’s high court ruled unanimously that the state improperly delegated taxing power to the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority, which is not elected by the citizens. The decision essentially gutted the state’s 2007 transportation funding plan.

That ruling was one of several that Patrick McSweeney, attorney for the plaintiffs, cited in arguing that the Dulles Toll Road transfer is also unconstitutional.

Under the 50-year deal, the airports authority would operate the road and collect tolls, some of which would be spent on construction of a 23-mile Metrorail extension to Dulles.

— Associated Press

Tagged: Dulles, NVTA

Comments:

Note: LoudounExtra.com does not necessarily agree with comments posted below — responsibility lies with the relevant reader alone. Peruse our reader agreement and privacy policy

Just what we need: More RoVa people disrupting our transportation needs for their own minimal gain. If this was really an issue of law or process, they should have gotten their delegate to introduce a measure in the last session. Instead, it gets played out in the courts.

Posted by danwpnews (anonymous) on April 17, 2008 at 2:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Dont have an account? Sign up!